Regarding Alleged Prejudices. - Fix Our World2024-03-29T13:30:17Zhttps://fixourworld.ca/forum/topics/regarding-alleged-prejudices?feed=yes&xn_auth=noDem,
First to me first thing…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-07:2024711:Comment:164632009-12-07T12:20:38.872ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
Dem,<br />
First to me first thing is first. If we are expecting to be able to engage in peaceful protest then we must ensure the Charter is not trampled on. If we loose those Chartered rights what actions does the general population / unions/ etc have
Dem,<br />
First to me first thing is first. If we are expecting to be able to engage in peaceful protest then we must ensure the Charter is not trampled on. If we loose those Chartered rights what actions does the general population / unions/ etc have What it has said of our gover…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-06:2024711:Comment:164622009-12-06T23:50:20.032ZKos Demojenhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/KosDemojen
What it has said of our government since the war of 1812...that within those hallowed halls lives the corporate interests of a conglomerate sucking the blood out of peter to pay paul and that when push comes to shove, the response our own government gives us to a fair and just request is silence.<br />
<br />
We invest alot of money in government officials who are not leaders. Who do the work and push the paper and who could care less if our rights are heard all because ontop of their having an interest in…
What it has said of our government since the war of 1812...that within those hallowed halls lives the corporate interests of a conglomerate sucking the blood out of peter to pay paul and that when push comes to shove, the response our own government gives us to a fair and just request is silence.<br />
<br />
We invest alot of money in government officials who are not leaders. Who do the work and push the paper and who could care less if our rights are heard all because ontop of their having an interest in our profit margin, the less work they have to do the less they have to work for.<br />
<br />
Make a government job part salary and part wages and I'm sure they'll be more inclined to do their part and do it right or leave their position to those who already are.<br />
<br />
Expect things to get worse. We're run by a minority government after all and Harper's a conservative. Dem,
Not loosing sight of my…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-06:2024711:Comment:164592009-12-06T23:25:28.389ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
Dem,<br />
Not loosing sight of my goal, that we protect all our freedoms in the Charter. I am not angry I am passionate!<br />
I am however disgusted a severe lack of its application and those who were made aware of it did nothing what does that say about how they are serving Canada?
Dem,<br />
Not loosing sight of my goal, that we protect all our freedoms in the Charter. I am not angry I am passionate!<br />
I am however disgusted a severe lack of its application and those who were made aware of it did nothing what does that say about how they are serving Canada? Whatever you do, don't lose s…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-05:2024711:Comment:164542009-12-05T09:15:42.701ZKos Demojenhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/KosDemojen
Whatever you do, don't lose sight of your goal.<br />
Anger is not the sharp edge of the sword, it is the hand that weilds it, and in so doing is a disservice to it's grace.
Whatever you do, don't lose sight of your goal.<br />
Anger is not the sharp edge of the sword, it is the hand that weilds it, and in so doing is a disservice to it's grace. As well how about murder Dem…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164102009-12-04T12:25:06.387ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
As well how about murder Dem it is a federal offence and the Hamilton Police have pressed charges many many many times over. In their oath they will uphold the constitution act ,, but the results speak for themselves nada woman says this man says that no investigation, the man is guilty ,,, hmmm guilty verdict before a trial yet both is viva voce evidence take mine a step further only after I said lets CHCH tv know and then and only then was that desk Sargent interested hmmmmmm lets see they…
As well how about murder Dem it is a federal offence and the Hamilton Police have pressed charges many many many times over. In their oath they will uphold the constitution act ,, but the results speak for themselves nada woman says this man says that no investigation, the man is guilty ,,, hmmm guilty verdict before a trial yet both is viva voce evidence take mine a step further only after I said lets CHCH tv know and then and only then was that desk Sargent interested hmmmmmm lets see they knew she committed the crime way before Feb 3 2009 and yet nothing,,, hmmm I wonder what my Ex said to them but can't speculate on that but what is documented and very provable is that she was a music drama major from Queens university and while I cannot say she played it up for the police I can say she would definatly know how.<br />
To the Femminist/ Anti-violence movement out there if this woman did play it up for the police and they just believed her story blindly they both have done serious harm to your cause.<br />
A further thought there is a take back the night march why is it end violence against women and children and not just end relationship violence period???? why a distinction between the sexxes? violence is inflicted on all parties and both sexxes have the ability to do it. I abohr violence if you result to it violence out of anger your own fault but if lack of action and equality increases anger then at what point does a man loose hope and control over his anger? also Dem look how well the RC…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164092009-12-04T03:49:01.927ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
also Dem look how well the RCMP did on there investigation to the polish man in B.C. police investigating police sheesh can we all say conflict of interest
also Dem look how well the RCMP did on there investigation to the polish man in B.C. police investigating police sheesh can we all say conflict of interest Demojen,
I could have but I h…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164082009-12-04T03:46:43.925ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
Demojen,<br />
I could have but I have been an angry man for over 10 months now it has landed my fiance in the hospitol,,, no more my line in the sand is drawn ,,,, do what you want to me but mess with whom I hope will be the mother of my children and thats it I am willing to do this much to ensure our safety and equal benefit of the law.
Demojen,<br />
I could have but I have been an angry man for over 10 months now it has landed my fiance in the hospitol,,, no more my line in the sand is drawn ,,,, do what you want to me but mess with whom I hope will be the mother of my children and thats it I am willing to do this much to ensure our safety and equal benefit of the law. I still feel that this should…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164062009-12-04T03:29:44.963ZKos Demojenhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/KosDemojen
I still feel that this should go to the RCMP, for clearly the municipal police have an interest in covering their own ass. If you're alleging a miscarriage of justice at this point their even hearing your case could be considered a conflict of interest, since they are now in a position that they should be defending themselves from you and that means they can no longer be seen to be unbiased.
I still feel that this should go to the RCMP, for clearly the municipal police have an interest in covering their own ass. If you're alleging a miscarriage of justice at this point their even hearing your case could be considered a conflict of interest, since they are now in a position that they should be defending themselves from you and that means they can no longer be seen to be unbiased. now for abuse lets see contro…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164052009-12-04T03:15:09.520ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
now for abuse lets see controling the outcome of a Human rights issue with my former employer which may or may not have resulted in monetary gain did ask for but it never got heard. How about intentional denial of my freedoms by her as well? I'm not saying that people don't make mistakes I've made my share heck if the police weren't so pig headed about the whole situation if the first place would I be there infront of the court house? It just seems awful damn suspicious that after going to the…
now for abuse lets see controling the outcome of a Human rights issue with my former employer which may or may not have resulted in monetary gain did ask for but it never got heard. How about intentional denial of my freedoms by her as well? I'm not saying that people don't make mistakes I've made my share heck if the police weren't so pig headed about the whole situation if the first place would I be there infront of the court house? It just seems awful damn suspicious that after going to the police in Jan and Feb of this year and then to lay an information in August 2 events seperated by 6 months nothing was done ,,,, look at the laws that they say we all are to work with and yet,,,,<br />
My flyer is explosive and gets peoples attention it needs to if I am right but I believe I'm right enough to be out infront of that court house. ok Demojen need to answer you…tag:fixourworld.ca,2009-12-04:2024711:Comment:164042009-12-04T02:58:16.094ZEdward Teachhttps://fixourworld.ca/profile/EdwardTeach
ok Demojen need to answer your replies and thank you for posting takes guts,<br />
The definition of abuse is this<br />
<br />
Stuff from Health Canada website at <a href="http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/publications/rcmp-grc/fem-partnrabus-eng.php" target="_blank">http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/publications/rcmp-grc/fem-partnrabus-eng.php</a><br />
<br />
What is spousal and partner abuse?<br />
Spousal abuse covers a wide range of acts, from explosive violence to chronic behaviours like belittling. It can involve…
ok Demojen need to answer your replies and thank you for posting takes guts,<br />
The definition of abuse is this<br />
<br />
Stuff from Health Canada website at <a href="http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/publications/rcmp-grc/fem-partnrabus-eng.php" target="_blank">http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ncfv-cnivf/publications/rcmp-grc/fem-partnrabus-eng.php</a><br />
<br />
What is spousal and partner abuse?<br />
Spousal abuse covers a wide range of acts, from explosive violence to chronic behaviours like belittling. It can involve physical, sexual and/or emotional abuse. There are many types of abuse and degrees of severity. Spousal and partner abuse can be committed by a spouse or exspouse, a current or former common-law partner, a current or former girlfriend or boyfriend or a person in a dating relationship.<br />
Physical violence can involve a threat with a fist or object; being pushed or shoved in a way that could result in injury; being slapped, hit or beaten; being hit or attacked with an object. There may be no obvious physical injuries, or there may be bruises, cuts, broken bones, internal injuries, disfigurement, disablement and even death.<br />
Sexual assault may be part of a physical attack. Sexual acts within a marriage or intimate partnership must take place with consent. There is no “right” to sexual relations.<br />
Emotional abuse can include threats and intimidation, demeaning and degrading verbal and body language, control and isolation, subordination and humiliation. Victims may suffer serious loss of self-esteem and experience feelings of shame, anxiety, hopelessness, depression and terror.<br />
<br />
while my ex's actions were not physical it clearly is abuse.<br />
first I applied under section 53.5 of the transitional board it was denied. Reason no reply to papers mailed to me in 2008. filed my appeal and same result same reasoning failure to reply. My third appeal is called a reconsideration it was filed as well and done on October 30 2009. I have been letting them know what happened and nothing. Now I cannot put a monetary value to that case that should be before the human rights tribunal right now but I can say that failure by the agencies that be to investigate upon my allegations is brutal. I was there at the police station and complained any investigation only when I threatened to go to the news did they even consider acting and if I complain consistantly and they do nothing but when I say news they all of a sudden wanna act ??? makes me just a tad suspicious. now about His Worship Brown you are obviously versed in the rules of civil procedure look at the Laying of an information by a private citizen. Are there grounds for Insufficiency? If the Crown is supposed to advise A justice of the peace on the law did they? Relevant bits of Legislation. First lets go to their oaths Oath of office<br />
8. Every Crown Attorney and every assistant Crown Attorney, before entering upon his or her duties, shall take and subscribe before a judge of the Superior Court of Justice the following oath:<br />
I swear (or affirm) that I will truly and faithfully, according to the best of my skill and ability, execute the duties, powers and trusts of Crown Attorney (or assistant Crown Attorney) without favour or affection to any party: So help me God. (Delete if affirmed)<br />
R.S.O. 1990, c. C.49, s. 8; 2006, c. 19, Sched. C, s. 1 (1).<br />
<br />
The Justice of the peaces is similar ok<br />
Now lets look at some of the rule which there would be no need for the Rcmp to be invovled the laying of an information by a private citizen<br />
<br />
23. (1) Any person who, on reasonable and probable grounds, believes that one or more persons have committed an offence, may lay an information in the prescribed form and under oath before a justice alleging the offence and the justice shall receive the information.<br />
<br />
Idem<br />
<br />
(2) An information may be laid anywhere in Ontario. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33, s. 23.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
25. (1) Each offence charged in an information shall be set out in a separate count.<br />
<br />
Allegation of offence<br />
<br />
(2) Each count in an information shall in general apply to a single transaction and shall contain and is sufficient if it contains in substance a statement that the defendant committed an offence therein specified.<br />
<br />
Reference to statutory provision<br />
<br />
(3) Where in a count an offence is identified but the count fails to set out one or more of the essential elements of the offence, a reference to the provision creating or defining the offence shall be deemed to incorporate all the essential elements of the offence.<br />
<br />
Idem<br />
<br />
(4) The statement referred to in subsection (2) may be,<br />
<br />
(a) in popular language without technical averments or allegations of matters that are not essential to be proved;<br />
<br />
(b) in the words of the enactment that describes the offence; or<br />
<br />
(c) in words that are sufficient to give to the defendant notice of the offence with which the defendant is charged.<br />
<br />
More than one count<br />
<br />
(5) Any number of counts for any number of offences may be joined in the same information.<br />
<br />
Particulars of count<br />
<br />
(6) A count shall contain sufficient detail of the circumstances of the alleged offence to give to the defendant reasonable information with respect to the act or omission to be proved against the defendant and to identify the transaction referred to.<br />
<br />
Sufficiency<br />
<br />
(7) No count in an information is insufficient by reason of the absence of details where, in the opinion of the court, the count otherwise fulfils the requirements of this section and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, no count in an information is insufficient by reason only that,<br />
<br />
(a) it does not name the person affected by the offence or intended or attempted to be affected;<br />
<br />
(b) it does not name the person who owns or has a special property or interest in property mentioned in the count;<br />
<br />
(c) it charges an intent in relation to another person without naming or describing the other person;<br />
<br />
(d) it does not set out any writing that is the subject of the charge;<br />
<br />
<br />
Now if these are the rules That Justice Brown were suppossed to adhere to on Aug !8 then why was no warrant and or summons issued? Why didn't the Crown speak up and mention this to His Worship?