Edward Teach's Page

Mission Statement:
I'm out there fighting not just for my rights but yours as well, Our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS - Equality
I'm out here fighting for the women - you need your equal right but lets not forget what it means equal accoutability for your actions good or bad
I've got your back there sisters - I Haven't forgot about your rights.
I'm out here for the Aboriginals I know your plight
Don't worry brothers and sisters I won't stop the fight
I'm out here for the people in Caledonia whoose goverment severly failed them and whoose only fault was the liking of a community they trampled on your rights,
I have not forgoten I'm out there for you as well and your family's rights
I'm out there for our Great Charter and what it stands for
I'll not let them ignore it Thats something we all should abhor
I'm out there for the hungry and for your right to eat
It just ain't right how they let you sleep in the street
I've got your back brothers and sisters help keep up the fight
I'm out there for the children and there little voice for if we see our rights trambled it is them who needs our might
Don't worry little ones I'm out there for your rights
I'm out there for the victims for I have watched the news and trust me I've not forgoten bout Paul and Karla oh how it made me roar, for a person got off easy and our safety rights were ignored
Don't your worry brothers and sisters I'm out there fighting for your rights and more!
I'm out there for the police yeah we've butted heads but when you put away the bad ones you should be able to rest your weary head no more letting them out early I say they stay.
Don't worry I'm out there for you to brother and sisters I know the job you do.
I'm out here for the accused you deserve your equality but don't ask me to speak so loudly if your evil and mean
I've got your back brothers and sisters I will not stop our plight
I'm out there for brothers Tucker and Baldesaro for their Chartered Right to practice any religon yes I believe in their right
Don't you worry brothers and sisters I will not stop this fight!
I'm out here for our Military of whom we ask to fight.
I'm here to make sure the politicians make Good God Damn sure that they protect your rights!
Don't you worry those whom we ask to give their all
I WILL NOT DROP THE BALL AND I SHALL CONTINUE TO FIGHT!
I'll not ask any to join me in my peacefull hunger strike but just lend me your voice and help me Demand our Chartered Rights!
So if you don't believe me it is for you and yours I pray. For if we forget about the Charter its our Country's future that will surely pay.






Although an article on violence between spouses My Ex's actions are abuse. The fact that she knew it would have a detremental effect on my future is just the same as if she had of beat me with an object thereby limiting my rights to enjoy life. If I had caught her red handed in the crime I would have been well within my rights to use as much force necessary to stop her crimes, it happened twice so I say crimes.

Fed on myths, preying on men
Barbara Kay, National Post Published: Saturday, December 06, 2008

November was Domestic Violence Awareness month. Truth in advertising suggests it should be Y-Chromosome Apartheid Month. Far from promoting "awareness" of a social problem or remedies for men and women with anger issues, the month is basically a radical feminist war dance around the Original Sin of maleness, cheered on by "progressive" media sympathizers.
The annual verbal pogrom will find its apotheosis in to-day's 19th observance of the Montreal Massacre anniversary, our domestic violence industry's shrine to feminism's Big Lie of male unilateralism in domestic violence.
It's awkward that the Dec. 6, 1989 massacre of 14 women at Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal -- unlike ritual wartime massacres of men and boys, such as the 8,000-death horror of Srebrenica -- remains a freak one-off in the West, perpetrated by a lone sociopath, with neither prequel nor sequel to suggest a pattern. But emotion, not reason or facts, drives the Domestic Violence industry.
The truth is that the more precisely identified phenomenon of "intimate partner violence" (IPV) in Western culture is gender neutral, an acting out of psychological problems around intimacy that afflict men and women alike. IPV is initiated by both sexes in about equal proportions. Self-defence is rarely the motive for women's violence against men. Literally hundreds of peer-reviewed, community-based studies, including StatsCan's, confirm this. But they don't reach the public. (Under pressure from feminist organizations, for example, a Quebec health agency recently sequestered a commissioned psychosocial study showing men and women are equally culpable for IPV.)
But most damaging is the suppressed fact that even bilateral IPV in general is a relative rarity in our culture. A woman is more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by her spouse. IPV simply isn't the systemic epidemic that hysteria-mongering feminist organizations so shamelessly project.
Since 1980, the Quebec government has sanctioned the "fact" that 250,000-300,000 women over the age of 15 suffer IPV from their partners or husbands annually. Actually, about 14,000 Quebec women and 2,500 men annually report themselves victims of conjugal violence. Allegations deemed worthy of trial, however, are dramatically fewer in number.
Recently, the Quebec government abruptly withdrew its wildly conjectural 300,000 figure from Google-accessible circulation, after a pertinacious group of independent researchers demanded to know its source through the Access to Information Act. There was no source, of course. Yet financial allocations remain pegged to the mythical 300,000 and are exclusively awarded to women's projects.
This year, the Quebec Auditor-General's report focused an accusatory light on fiscal profligacy and lack of oversight in the women's abuse industry. Grants to abuse-related women's projects have soared from $30-million in 2002-2003 to $60-million in 2007-08. One six-bed shelter's grants in that period bounced from $58,832 to $406,817, even though the shelter only served nine women throughout 2006-07.
Almost half a million dollars to house nine women? Yet a bamboozled public believes thousands upon thousands of battered women are seeking refuge.
Reality just doesn't jibe with that picture. In 2004, the Yellow Brick House, an Aurora, Ont., shelter closed during a labour dispute. It emerged that of the eight women and three children residing there, only one woman was fleeing abuse. The others were homeless.
Exceptions, believers will say. Everyone "knows" violence against women is epidemic.
Really? Edmonton Police Service reports from 1999-2000 indicate the police responded to 3,000 domestic incidents. They referred exactly 24 women--less than 1% -- to shelters.
That 1% figure recurs again and again. The co-ordinator of Cornwall Commmunity Hospital's Assault and Sexual Abuse Program in Cornwall, Ont., claims that "17-30% of all women treated in hospital emergency departments are victims of domestic violence." Reality check: Her own hospital's screening for abuse of 157,000 in-patients turned up only 150 IPV-related injuries (both sexes).
I'll conclude with the words of a former batterer, Linda Kinsella. When her unprovoked anger turned to rage, Kinsella used to scapegoat her disabled husband by tipping over his wheelchair and otherwise abusing him. Adding to his nightmare, the police (typically, stupidly) arrested him when called to the scene.
Therapy for Linda saved their marriage.A repentant Kinsella asks: "If women are able to do all the good things that men can do in [the] professions ... then why [do] we, as a society, deny that women can do the bad too? It is my fondest hope that someday there will be true equality in our society and that domestic violence will be seen not as a gender issue but as a societal one that will end when we work together to stop it."
Amen, brothers and sisters.
bkay@videotron.ca